CBI Tightens Noose Over Iron and Coal Theft in SAIL, Coal India; Several Officials Under Scanner
CISF Security Network Under CBI Scrutiny as Bhilai Probe Intensifies and FIR Names Two Officials in BCCL Dhanbad Case

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has intensified its probe into alleged iron and coal theft at major public sector installations, with the investigation at SAIL’s Bhilai Steel Plant gathering pace and a formal FIR already registered against two CISF officials in the BCCL Dhanbad area.
At Bhilai Steel Plant, the CBI has stepped up its investigation into alleged theft of iron and steel material. The probe is examining the circumstances surrounding the alleged theft and the role of personnel responsible for security and surveillance at the strategically important steel plant.
Meanwhile, the CBI has registered an FIR against CISF Deputy Commandant Om Kumar Tanwar and Inspector Raj Lakshmi Verma in connection with the case linked to security operations at BCCL’s Dhanbad area. Further investigation and action have been initiated.
CISF Personnel Under Scanner
The Dhanbad case has brought the role of individual CISF personnel sharply into focus. The investigation is examining whether security officials allegedly facilitated, ignored or failed to prevent activities connected with coal theft.
The agency is also understood to be looking into the possible involvement of other serving and retired CISF personnel who were posted in sensitive locations during the period under investigation.
The key question is whether the alleged incidents were isolated cases or whether they point towards a wider network involving individuals responsible for protecting coal-bearing areas and regulating access.
Bhilai Probe Adds to Security Concerns
The parallel investigation at SAIL’s Bhilai Steel Plant has widened the scope of concern over security arrangements at India’s major industrial installations.
The CBI is expected to examine access controls, movement of material, surveillance systems and the role of personnel responsible for preventing unauthorised removal of iron and steel.
The two investigations have consequently placed the security apparatus around valuable PSU assets under the spotlight.
The Bigger Question
The central issue now before investigators is simple: How could organised theft allegedly take place despite the presence of a dedicated security force?
If the CBI establishes collusion or deliberate negligence by individual security personnel, the implications could extend beyond the persons already named in the Dhanbad FIR.
The investigation will determine whether the cases involve isolated misconduct or reveal a wider security network that allowed valuable coal and iron assets to be allegedly siphoned off.
For now, the focus remains firmly on the CISF personnel and officials whose alleged roles are being examined, while the CBI continues to piece together the complete chain of events.
The allegations are under investigation, and culpability will be established only through due legal process.



